From Public Diplomacy to Digital Discontent
How Online Narratives Have Strained US–South Africa Diplomatic Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51415/jpmir.v1i3.1748Keywords:
US, South Africa, digital diplomacy, white genocide, online narrativesAbstract
This paper explores the evolving contours of US-South Africa diplomatic relations through the lens of digital discourse and online narratives. While traditional public diplomacy once served as a tool for fostering mutual understanding and cooperation among states, the proliferation of digital platforms has introduced new dynamics of interactions among nations with varying degrees of success and failure. Drawing on content analysis and the soft power perspective, the study investigates how digital narratives, ranging from accusations of white genocide to divergent positions on global conflicts such as the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Palestine crisis, have strained bilateral ties between South Africa and the United States of America. The research situates these narratives within broader geopolitical realignments and domestic political sentiments, highlighting how digital misinformation, algorithmic amplification, and politicised online messaging have contributed to mistrust and policy misalignment. Ultimately, the paper argues that digital discontent is not merely a reflection of diplomatic tensions but an active force shaping them.
Downloads
References
Abbasov, A. (2007). Digital diplomacy: Embedding information and communication technologies in the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. The Australian Institute of International Affairs.Abbas, Z. & Yousaf, M. (2024). The evolution of diplomacy in the digital age: Opportunities and challenges. Researchgate.net. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16396.42889
Adesina, O.S. (2017). Foreign policy in an era of digital diplomacy, Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1).1297175, DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2017.1297175
AfriForum (2024). Farm attacks and murders in South Africa (2023).https://www.artikels.afriforum.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Farm-attacks-andmurders-in-South-Africa-2023.pdf (Accessed 21 September 2025).
Ashish, S. & Varsha, S. (2022). Digital diplomacy and the global pandemic. Media Asia, 49(1),62–64. DOI: 10.1080/01296612.2021.1973324
Ayodele, O. (2021). The digital transformation of diplomacy: Implications for the African Union and continental diplomacy. South African Journal of International Affairs, 28(3),379-401, DOI: 10.1080/10220461.2021.1968944
Barman, S. (2024). Digital diplomacy: The influence of digital platforms on global diplomacy and foreign policy. Peer-Review, Multidisciplinary & Multilingual Journal, 3(1), 61–75.
Bhorat, H., Lilenstein, A., Monnakgotla, J., Thornton, A., van der Zee, K. (2017). The socioeconomic determinants of crime in South Africa: An empirical assessment. Development Policy Research Unit. DPRU, University of Cape Town.
Bjola, C., & Jiang, L. (2015). Social media and public diplomacy: A comparative analysis of the digital diplomatic strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice (pp. 71–88). New York, NY: Routledge.
Chau, N.B. (2025). How Trump misrepresented images to support claims of White Genocide in South Africa, including Congo video. CBS News, 23 May 2025.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-white-genocide-south-africa-congovideo/?utm_source=chatgpt.com (Accessed 24 September, 2025)
Clinton, H. R. (2010). Remarks on Internet Freedom. U.S. Department of State. https://20092017.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/135519.htm
Collins, S. D., DeWitt, J. R., & LeFebvre, R. K. (2019). Hashtag diplomacy: Twitter as a tool for engaging in public diplomacy and promoting U.S. Foreign Policy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-019-00119-5
Cull, N. J. (2011). WikiLeaks, public diplomacy 2.0 and the state of digital public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 7 (1): 1–8. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ pb. 2011.
Cummings, R. (2025). Repairing South Africa’s fractured relationship with the United States.https://www.csis.org/analysis/repairing-south-africas-fractured-relationship-united-states
Govender, D. (2018). Contact and property-related crimes in South Africa: Need for strategies and democratic policing. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 13(1), 55–67.
Hanson, F. (2012, October 25). Baked in and wired: eDiplomacy@State, Foreign Policy Paper Series no 30
Holmes, M. (2015). The future of digital diplomacy. In C. Bjola & M. Holmes (Eds.), Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice (pp. 199–206). New York, NY: Routledge.
Krebs, R. R. (2015). Narrative and the making of US National Security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (2014). Digital diplomacy. Retrieved from http://www. gatewayhouse.in/digitaldiplomacy-2/
Manor, I. & Segev, E. (2015). America’s selfie: How the US portrays itself on its social media accounts. In Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice, ed. Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes, 89–108. New York: Routledge.
Mazumdar, B.T. (2024). Digital diplomacy: Internet‑based public diplomacy activities or novel forms of public engagement? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, (20), 24–43 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00208-4
Mukunda, G. 2012. Indispensable: When Leaders really Matter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Nye, J. (2011). The Future of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Nye, J. (2005). On the rise and fall of American soft power. New Perspectives Quarterly, (22), 75–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/npqu.2005.22.issue-3
Özdemir, G.S., Yıldız, A.K. (2024). Bringing Diplomacy to the Digital Age: The Implementation and Impact of Digital Diplomacy in the USA. In Akıllı, E., Güneş, B., Güner, O. (eds.), Digital Diplomacy in the OSCE Region. Contributions to International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50966-7_11 (pp. 113–123)
Pamment, J. (2016). Digital diplomacy as transmedia engagement: Aligning theories of participatory culture with international advocacy campaigns. New Media and Society 18(9), 2046–2062. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 14614 44815 577792.
Pelling, J. (2015). When doing becomes the message: The case of Swedish digital diplomacy. In Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes (eds) Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice, 164–180. New York: Routledge.
Potter, E. H. (2002). Cyber-diplomacy: Managing foreign policy in the twenty-first century. Ontario: McGill-Queen’s Press.
Sandre, A. (2015). Digital Diplomacy: Conversations On Innovation in Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Smith, D. (2025). Trump ambushes South African president with video and false claims of anti-white racism. The Guardian, 21 May 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/usnews/2025/may/21/trump-south-africa-president-meeting?utm_source=chatgpt.com(Accessed 24 September 2025).
Sotiriu, S. (2015). Digital diplomacy: Between promises and reality. In Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes (eds) Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice, 33–51. New York: Routledge.
StatsSA. (2020). Governance, public safety, and justice survey GPSJS 2019/20. Retrieved from:http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0341/P03412019.pdf.
Thom, L. (2025). Is there a white genocide in South Africa? Examining Trump's Oval Office claim. ABC News, 21 May. Accessed on 21 April 2026 at https://abcnews.com/Politics/white-genocide-south-africa-examining-trumps-oval-office/story?id=122052444
U.S. Department of State. (2014). 21st century statecraft: The “Internet moment” in foreign policy. Retrieved fromhttp://www.state.gov/statecraft/overview/index.htm
U.S. Department of State. 2010. Department of State Launches Foster Online Open Dialogue. U.S. Department of State. https://20092017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/03/138326.htm
Wedeen, L. (2015). Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric, and Symbols in Contemporary Syria. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edwin Yingi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
