“Am I in Control of My Own Writing?”: Training Postgraduate Candidates in the Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1512

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, academic writing, activity theory, evaluation research

Abstract

There is concern in higher education about the widespread use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools in academic writing. Consequently, many institutions are creating policies to regulate their use. Despite these efforts, the use of GAI continues to expand. With free GAI tools readily available, the issue to be addressed is their ethical and responsible use. This study addresses this issue through the evaluation of a training intervention that integrated GAI tools to enhance postgraduate students’ academic writing skills. The research question addressed was: How does training and supporting postgraduate students in the responsible use of GAI tools impact their academic writing? The research design integrated formative, summative and reflective forms of evaluation. The study drew on Cultural Historical Activity Theory to analyse postgraduate students developing understandings of integrity in academic writing while using GAI tools. The study found that although initially impressed with GAI tools, participants became more critical over time. Drawing on insights from the study, a reconceptualisation of the role of GAI tools in postgraduate students’ academic writing across disciplines is proposed, and guidelines for responsible implementation are made, ultimately contributing to the ongoing discourse on the intersection of technology and education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

04-12-2024

How to Cite

Winberg, C., Engel-Hills, P. and Winberg, S. L. (2024) “‘Am I in Control of My Own Writing?’: Training Postgraduate Candidates in the Responsible Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing”, African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), pp. 1–12. doi: 10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1512.